一诺千金

情感至少有两个层次，一个是父子关系，细节显示了满满的父子之爱。送对戒很浪漫，刺青很酷，还有带儿子去享受力比多。在物质和精神上尽自己最大的努力关爱和帮助儿子。然而，恰恰是这个深爱构成了戏剧冲突的关键之一。

另一个层次就是儿子本能对正义的维护，这个维护是剧情推进的核心，围绕维护才能展开行动。于是就能看到比利时劳工的艰难处境，还有种族歧视达到了怎样一种可怖的程度。同时还很好地拍出了非洲女主体，这个女性有尊严，聪明，坚强。从眼神到姿态到说话，每一个细节都处理得相当到位。比如最后一个镜头，她得知丈夫死亡的真相，沉默了那么十几秒后迅速调整好去做自己最应该（良知）和想做（自由意志）的事情——安葬自己的丈夫。（而不是崩溃和跑掉）。导演很尊重人还体现在，拍非洲巫术，不会让我感觉到迷信和诡异，因为每次巫术都是准的，同时镜头扫到小主人公的表情，呈现出他紧张的心理状态。

正义和血缘反复冲突的线索很清晰的情况下。小主人公才有理由不相信他爸爸，才有资格把他爸爸锁起来以免他爸爸干出更可怕的事情。这就是导演的立场。

THE PROMISE is Dardenne Brothers’ third feature, which heralds their incredible rising into the stratosphere of cinematic auteur-land, and reaping coveted top-shelf international awards almost with every each feature henceforward.

Starring a 14-year-old Jérémie Renier in his breakthrough role as the young Belgian boy Igor, an apprentice mechanic often at beck and call of his single father Roger (Gourmet, also a bonanza due to the brothers’ discovery), THE PROMISE plays its realism trump card implacably through DP Alain Marcoen’s handheld camera, staying ultra-close to the involving incidents, mostly inside a mangy tenement house dwelled all sorts of immigrants in Belgium.

Setting the story in an unnamed city’s twilight zone with a subdued palette, Dardenne Brothers resolutely eschews any imagery that betrays a semblance of a developed Western country, Roger is a stony-faced backdoor organizer of illegal immigration, in a purely business manner, all he cares is the money (transportation fee and rent), meantime, employing several immigrants to refurbish his own house, also it is not above him to sell any of them down the river when situation demands.

During a police raiding, one of the African immigrants Amidou (Rasmane Ouedraogo) accidentally falls from the scaffold and is mortally wounded, naturally Roger will not allow him to be taken to the hospital, against Igor’s supplication, and before Amidou kicks up the bucket, he solicits a promise from Igor to look after his wife Assita (Assita Ouedraogo) and their infant boy, who have newly arrived on the premise. So how far Igor, ridden with cumulative guilt, will go to keep this promise, when his inchoate moral righteousness doesn’t see eye to eye with Roger’s high-handed, callous directives?

Dardenne brothers’ no-frill narrative seldom takes our attention away from their characters, and withholds a stamina of matter-of-factness so pertinacious that the story never slumps into mushiness, for instance, Assita’s hardened hostility towards the father-son duo hardly ever relents (she appears more bemused than touched when Igor impulsively embraces her), even in the film’s most emotive moment, a simple gesture of gratitude is more than enough. In a typically veiled case of mollifying a white person’s own guilt, that is as good as that person can expect.

Both Renier and Assita Ouedraogo exude an unalloyed rawness from a novice performer that befits their characters, from a street-smart, small-time crook to a brave adolescent rebelling against his violent, amoral father, Igor’s rite-of-passage is rendered with steely conviction and persuasion from Renier’s simmering, unshowy, tender presence. As for an unprepossessing Gourmet, combing an elemental savagery with a soupçon of canniness, he becomes a lodestone on the screen, and serves as a self-reflexive vector for some viewers to muse upon his outrageousness, which isn’t at all far from reality.

Also THE PROMISE has a killer ending, Dardenne brothers is judicious enough to bring down the curtain right after Igor finally makes a clean breast of that gnawing whopper (with both actors’ muted reaction and a final and finally static shot gazing at the duo walking back to grasp the nettle), and leave its aftermath merely to audience’s own imagination, yet what will happen is fairly clear, certainly no requirement of a justice-prevailing denouement to flog a feeling of satisfaction to death, since the story is hinged upon Igor, when his moral compass is set in the right direction, that is where it should end.

20-odd years after, one can feel a shade dispirited to see that THE PROMISE and its thematic refrain are still painfully topical today, but for Dardenne brothers’ unique stock-in-trade and immense humanity blossoming from their canon, we should all tip our hats to them with a this-world-doesn’t-deserve-you postscript.

referential entries: Dardenne Brothers’ THE SON (2002, 7.9/10); THE KID WITH A BIKE (2011, 8.0/10); TWO DAYS, ONE NIGHT (2014, 8.6/10).

现实主义的感人之处：永远无错的一方，所有的冲突都包含在物竞天择的世界真相里；一部电影的“挂件”：重复出现的符号，于电影表意似无联系但尤使人印象深刻，如同唇钉耳环；情绪光谱：一个场景的核心事件结束之后，仍要不遗余力地拓展人物的状态，如同红外到紫外的可见光谱，使人物尤其有共情力，使影片尤其有意境，侯孝贤即为一例，他甚至直接进入状态而彻底抛除事件，呈现一种鸟瞰的时空；导演在试图拉近观众的情感距离时，有两种方法，一是直白、宏大、强烈地铺陈情感如《两生花》，一是循循善诱带领观众在异世界丛林曲折穿行，而后者尤其需要清晰的叙事，本片因为环境语境较陌生，我数次尝试情感介入均受阻，但是我本身之责任，这一点启示不要试图描摹异文化陌生世界；达内的现实主义是一种极高明的艺术创造，在大众温饱的世界里描摹个人贫困有何意义？可以说他是导演个人的“道格玛95”，它洗涤着导演的创作态度，不断提醒创作者回溯自己原初的艺术使命，那本来是博爱而悲悯啊；看一个导演的片子，第一部喜欢，越看越享受，越看越洁净，不断抛除各种阅读限制，真是诗化的体验，达内兄弟的戛然式样片尾对我已成极深刻烙印。

最近在阅读吕克·达内的电影手记《影像背后》，里面有一些导演自己创作作品的心路历程，对于理解影片很有帮助。我想摘录其中关于每部电影的部分，帮助达内影迷们更好地走进达内的电影世界。

十分推荐大家阅读这本《影像背后》，达内兄弟对于哲学的思考和对于生活的观察都在其中有所体现。

影评字数不够，粘上我的短评吧：

一场道德上的自我觉醒，以戒指为线索，影票中伊格一步步摆脱情感上的顺从和亲情上的依赖，以一种失去一切为代价的姿态赎罪。善良不能从一，作恶不能而终。人性的矛盾就在这样的撕扯中形成悲剧，但同时也闪烁着道德的光辉。